Pulling Back The Curtain On Global Warming Fraud

The proponents of manmade global warming routinely offer charts like Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” published by the UN claiming that atmospheric temperatures were basically stable over the past millennium until they soared after the Industrial Revolution and the advent of the automobile when human CO2 emissions soared exponentially.

hs

In reality, atmospheric temperatures over the past millennium did not plod along like the lines on the Mann graph and instead swung wildly up and down as the graph of the actual raw data shows below.

Screen Shot 2015-04-26 at 10.59.21 AM   26 April 2015

The noisy spread of temperatures between the swings on this graph is represents the natural variation of atmospheric temperature driven by the constantly changing interaction of the sun’s energy with the oceans and atmosphere.

This week, Duke University published a peer reviewed study of the actual raw temperature data over time and found that the slight warming over the past century and the “moderate” manmade global warming model predictions are well within the natural variability of temperature over the past millennium. In sum, Duke found that human CO2 emissions do not appear to be producing a pronounced warming outside of the natural variation of the climate.

How then can we account for the difference between the raw temperature data used by Duke University and the nice smooth temperature line shown in the Mann “hockey stick” graph?

It is becoming increasingly clear that the proponents of manmade global warming who run the major temperature databases are statistically manipulating the real temperature data to show a significant recent warming that does not exist in fact.

The first evidence of this manipulation emerged back during the 2009 Climategate scandal, when a still unknown person disclosed reams of secret data from Britain’s Climate Research Unit at East Anglia (CRU). Internal programing notes in the CRU database suggested that scientists at CRU had simply made up many of the weather stations and measurements upon which their “adjusted” temperature record relied.

In 2011, the BEST database published “adjusted” temperature data showing uninterrupted warming since 1950, when the raw data showed no warming for the past decade.

In 2015, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed that 2014 was the hottest year in recorded history, but closer examination of their data revealed that GISS scientists were manipulating South American temperature measurements upward.

Hopefully, we will soon have a more thorough review of the discrepancies between the “adjusted” temperature data published by the major databases and the raw temperatures measured at the actual weather stations. The Global Warming Policy Foundation, a think tank dedicated to challenging the manmade global warming hypothesis, has engaged five scientists from various scientific fields to look into that question.

Manmade global warming advocates have already started to attack the proposed study before it has even completed its work. Pay no attention to that data behind the curtain, they exclaim!

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Yes, It Can Happen Here – Part II

Imagine a banana republic where the ruling party’s criminal prosecutors and judges send the police with battering rams to break into the homes of political dissidents, seize their computers and telephones to find out with whom they are communicating, and then order the dissidents not to tell their neighbors or the press what happened or else.

Did Cuba or maybe Venezuela come to mind?

Try again.

I am referring to the state of Wisconsin in the United States of America.

search

In his scathing expose Wisconsin’s Shame, National Review writer David French began:

‘THEY CAME WITH A BATTERING RAM.”

Cindy Archer, one of the lead architects of Wisconsin’s Act 10 — also called the “Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill,” it limited public-employee benefits and altered collective-bargaining rules for public-employee unions — was jolted awake by yelling, loud pounding at the door, and her dogs’ frantic barking. The entire house — the windows and walls — was shaking.

She looked outside to see up to a dozen police officers, yelling to open the door. They were carrying a battering ram.

She wasn’t dressed, but she started to run toward the door, her body in full view of the police. Some yelled at her to grab some clothes, others yelled for her to open the door.

“I was so afraid,” she says. “I did not know what to do.” She grabbed some clothes, opened the door, and dressed right in front of the police. The dogs were still frantic.

“I begged and begged, ‘Please don’t shoot my dogs, please don’t shoot my dogs, just don’t shoot my dogs.’ I couldn’t get them to stop barking, and I couldn’t get them outside quick enough. I saw a gun and barking dogs. I was scared and knew this was a bad mix.”

She got the dogs safely out of the house, just as multiple armed agents rushed inside. Some even barged into the bathroom, where her partner was in the shower. The officer or agent in charge demanded that Cindy sit on the couch, but she wanted to get up and get a cup of coffee.

“I told him this was my house and I could do what I wanted.” Wrong thing to say. “This made the agent in charge furious. He towered over me with his finger in my face and yelled like a drill sergeant that I either do it his way or he would handcuff me.”

…Then they left, carrying with them only a cellphone and a laptop.

This was one of many raids against members of conservative and libertarian groups ordered by Milwaukee District Attorney, Democrat John Chisholm, and for which Democrat Judge Barbara Kluka rubber stamped search warrants without any evidence of a crime.

Please read all of Mr. French’s essay at the link above, then share than link with everyone you know.

This kind of abuse of power cannot be allowed to stand.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 21 Comments

Another Day, Another Batch Of Clinton Corruption Scandals

Faux-Scandal

Back in the 1990s, the Democrat media used to routinely spike stories of Clinton corruption until Matt Drudge started leaking the stories at his blog. Now, the Democrat media is actually leading the charge in reporting on Bill and Hill’s latest influence peddling scandals. For a one stop collection of links to the current reporting, go read Jonathan Chait’s piece at the New York Magazine:

The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.

The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.

The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.”

And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton’s family’s charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.”

This is the best the Democrats can offer? Really?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Citizen Clinton Throws Her Hat In The Ring

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Useful Fool

Iran

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Did Hillary Clinton Hide Classified Information From Congress By Giving It To Our Enemies?

Congress’s Benghazi Select Committee has discovered that Hillary Clinton, while serving as Secretary of State, declined to use the State Department’s secured email, apparently to avoid regulations preserving those emails for requests by Congress and Freedom of Information Act requests by the public. Instead, Clinton used at least two email accounts operated by a private company.

In her efforts to avoid accountability to her own government, Mrs. Clinton instead very likely committed several thousand felony crimes by providing classified materials to a private third party, which were hacked by at least one foreigner and very likely by our nation’s enemies.

hc

Providing classified materials (the emails themselves containing classified information) and storing them at an unauthorized location (the email provider’s servers) violates 18 U.S.C. §1924, which states in pertinent part:

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

Each such email is a felony crime punishable by up to one year in prison.

What makes this worse is that Clinton blew off State Department IT warnings against using private email.

At least one Romanian hacker has already broken into and published materials from Clinton’s private email accounts. I suspect the Russians, Chinese, Iranians and heaven knows who else have also trolled through the server as well.

The Benghazi Committee will be calling Clinton to the stand under oath over the next several months. Is the assumed Democrat nominee for president going to take the fifth with an attorney by her side?

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Yes, It Can Happen Here

In 1935, Sinclair Lewis noted the rise of Adolph Hitler in Germany and penned a novel entitled It Can’t Happen Here describing an alternate America where the president becomes a fascist dictator.

book

Fast forward to the present.

Ramussen’s recent polling found that a plurality of Democrats have no real problem with their president exercising dictatorial powers:

43% of Democrats believe the president should have the right to ignore the courts. Only 35% of voters in President Obama’s party disagree, compared to 81% of Republicans and 67% of voters not affiliated with either major party.

Fifty-two percent (52%) of all voters believe, generally speaking, that court challenges of actions approved by the president and Congress help protect the rights of U.S. citizens. Thirty percent (30%), however, consider such challenges mostly nuisances that stand in the way of good policy. Eighteen percent (18%) are not sure.

Thirty-one percent (31%) think it is more important for government to operate efficiently than it is to preserve our system of checks and balances.

It is useful to remember that only 36.8% of German voters cast ballots for Adolph Hitler during the 1932 elections.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 11 Comments